Oct. 28, 2008 Webinar: Journalism, Audience and Advertising on the Web

Press freedom in China

Member alert: Free Speech Protection Act

Celebrate National Freedom of Speech Week, Oct. 20-26

· A list of all reports   · ASNE Convention material
· Codes of Ethics   · Fundamental Documents
· News releases   · The American Editor
Page Location: Home » Archives » Speeches
The Diminishing Use of Foreign News Reporting

Author: Edward Seaton
Published: July 01, 1998
Last Updated: August 28, 2002
Printer-friendly version

The Diminishing Use of Foreign News Reporting

Delivered May 26, 1998, in Moscow, before the International Press Institute

by Edward Seaton, editor-in-chief, The Manhattan (Kan.) Mercury 1998-99 ASNE President

The use of international news by mainstream U.S. media has declined appallingly the last two decades. A survey published last year by Harvard showed time devoted to international news by network television declined from 45 percent in the 1970s to 13.5 percent in 1995. That is a 70 percent drop. Three-fourths of the drop has come since the end of the Cold War. And I am certain, given the current entertainment meltdown of U.S. network television news, the numbers are even lower today.

Newspapers, which I know more about, never gave as large a percentage of their space to international news, but the decline in the amount they do allocate is even greater than television, from 10.2 percent in 1971 to something less than 2 percent today. That's a decline of more than 80 percent.

No U.S. newspaper editor would disagree with these figures. What might surprise them, however, is that readers and viewers in other countries apparently are seeing significant declines as well. Which, of course, is thereason we are discussing this topic here today. Even the United Nations' human rights chief has taken on the issue. Marking World Press Freedom Day earlier this month, Mary Robinson-who speaks here tomorrow-told a conference on press freedom that the world's media are irresponsibly downplaying international news and reducing complex issues to sound bites. She expressed fear that this is leading to foreign policy created in a news vacuum.

There are exceptions to these trends in the U.S., of course. In reality, what we have there is a two-tier press. The elite newspapers, like The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, offer wonderful coverage of the world to an elite readership highly interested in foreign policy. Perhaps 50 other daily newspapers do a reasonably good job, at least covering the part of the world most connected to their regions. Two of them are represented on our panel today by their editors. Then there are the rest of us, 1,550 dailies-many of whose editors seem to believe readers aren't interested in international news and, apparently, don't have need for it. Ten inches about mayhem is often their norm.

Most U.S. newspapers today are driven by the need to keep their ownerships' stock prices up. If news helps the newspaper's bottom line, it tends to be the lead story. And local news does that, so local tops every editor's marching orders. This is not necessarily new thinking or wrong. We've always known editing is mostly a matter of making the news relevant to readers' lives.

But today our readers are more engaged with the world than ever, yet our news columns seldom help them understand that world. If they read or hear about the world at all, they often see unconnected disasters that they learn to ignore-with confidence they will go away-and come to view the world outside the United States as inexplicably complex and even dangerous.

The situation cries out for better ideas, information and explanations that help readers figure out how international forces are affecting and changing their local communities and their lives.

These are the ideas underlying the initiative of American Society of Newspaper Editors that I want to tell you about. My hope is the project will awaken editors to the realities and opportunities of globalization. To some extent, we are suggesting a reinvention of the way editors approach international news. We believe U.S. editors should focus on pragmatic solutions, policies and real-life models rather than always being led by the White House and the State Department. They should help people cope with the globalized flow of money, jobs, technology, arms, culture, travel, communications, consumer goods, health care, medicine, illegal drugs, and so forth. In a word, localize. While we know not every important story will have a local connection, we believe if global links are framed in local terms and readers better understand the evolution and implications of international forces on their lives, their appetites for policy news will follow naturally.

I hope, by bringing the details of our project to you, I can stimulate you to consider, where appropriate, doing something about this problem in your own countries.

Permit me to describe our project. With assistance from The Freedom Forum, we are taking a careful look at how mainstream daily newspapers can improve international coverage. We will produce a handbook for every U.S. editor on covering the world and then hold workshops around the United States. We even plan to offer, as part of the annual ASNE writing awards contest, a prize for the best writing about the impact of international forces on the writer's local community.

To provide substance for the handbook we recently organized two roundtables of editors and experts. The first focused on why international news matters. A second explored techniques to improve international news coverage.

So why does international news in regional and local dailies matter? The roundtable participants came up with eight reasons:

  1. The United States is the world's only super-power. Americans have a leadership position, whether they like it or not. For Americans to be engaged in the world, there must be a level of public understanding of world issues.
  2. In a democracy, foreign policy is dependent on public support in times of crises, such as war or natural disaster. International news provides an early warning notice for wars, disasters, economic trends, etc. Ignorance is very expensive in the long term. An uninformed public offers opportunities for demagogues and enemies to cause serious harm.
  3. The world is increasingly interdependent in areas such as economics, the environment, crime, drug trafficking, health and immigration. International developments affect Americans' lives dramatically.
  4. International travel and the growth of foreign student exchanges present opportunities to local papers to explain the world to their readers.
  5. With the dramatic growth of immigrant communities in the United States, world news matters more to local readers. Newspapers can diversify in their marketplace with international news. It will help them grow and expand.
  6. Americans need context. TV doesn't provide it.
  7. Publishing international news gives readers a more complete newspaper.
  8. There are many engaging stories beyond our borders. And, a lot of them have local and regional angles.
A recent Pew Center poll showed international news ahead of sports and national politics. And this was with the narrow definition employed by the center's highly visible News Interest Index which excludes stories in which the United States is directly involved. If the U.S. becomes engaged, such as in Somalia or Iraq, a story is registered as a national story.

In a Pew Center study on the decline in TV viewership, where the more generic topic "international affairs" was surveyed, it placed fifth-ahead of Washington, sports, consumer and entertainment news.

For these reasons, as well as the eight identified by our roundtable participants, I believe many editors are missing an important connection to their readers by down-playing international news. My view was underscored at our roundtables by recent survey data from USA Today and Knight Ridder, a large publicly owned newspaper group.

John Simpson, USA Today deputy editor, reported their recent readership survey showed one of the things that drives reader loyalty is international news, and one of the major recommendations they plan to act on is increasing it.

Joyce Davis, Knight Ridder's deputy foreign editor, said their research shows their newspapers have gone overboard with local, and it found more than 60 percent of the people polled are highly interested in international news. Furthermore, she said, people who are dissatisfied with the paper "overwhelmingly" gave the reason as lack of international news.

Nonetheless, as I have said, many editors in the United States suffer from the comfortable illusion that Americans don't care about what's happening overseas. My belief is that if they don't care, at least in part, it's because they've been lulled into believing that what happens overseas will have no real impact on their own lives.

That's why the handbook we are developing, which is being written by George Krimsky, whom many of you know as the co-founder of the International Center for Journalists, will focus on practical techniques of connecting readers' lives to the world outside our borders.

Here are some of the ideas. First for the newsroom:

  • Develop an inventory of story sources in your community. This is a list of all the connections that local companies, organizations, institutions and people have with interests abroad. Circulate the inventory among the newsroom staff and post it on your Web site. Invite local people to add their names with their international connections and to suggest stories.
  • Create a list of the top 10 ways the community is linked to the world, and use it to prioritize and edit international stories from the wires.
  • Create a new newsroom culture. Assign features that find international connections to the community. Reward reporters who find the connections with front page coverage. Train and educate gatekeepers. Train everyone in the newsroom to rethink covering the world beyond politics, war and natural disasters. Pay premium salaries to staff members who know foreign languages or who have lived abroad. Give prizes for outstanding work.
Here are some ideas for stories:
  • Economic stories are very often entry points for covering the world.
  • Localize wire stories.
  • Package international stories with maps and graphics.
  • Tell the reader why he or she should care about the story.
  • News briefs must have context and explain why the reader should care. They should either relate significant stories or be relevant locally.
  • Relate world news to issues back home: jobs, the economy, immigration, trade, the environment.
  • Spotlight foreign-owned businesses, exports, foreign-educated professionals, international students, residents learning English as a second language, the impact of foreign competition on local industries, how the world's religions are practiced locally, international students and experts in international affairs when their countries or subject areas are in the news, and special hooks, such as women's issues around the world.
  • Send reporters abroad for short terms to develop stories with local ties.
  • Use stringers. The International Center for Journalists can put you in touch with reliable stringers in many countries.
  • Benefit from models developed by other newspapers. The Portland Oregonian, for example, highlights major international stories in full-page feature presentations several times a week. The material is mostly from the wires, although some government sources appear. Local connections are made whenever possible. Recent subjects: Ireland, South Africa, Summit of the Americas, President Clinton's Africa trip, NATO expansion, the Khmer Rouge.
We also have a number of recommendations for the wire services, including that they do more stories using the resources of their international staffs combined with their local and regional staffs, and that they produce more explanatory stories telling readers why they should care. We also hope they take on the role of educating the gatekeepers by providing an informed advisory at least weekly designed to help editors evaluate trends and developments so they can offer a more logical presentation of world news. The wires also should make suggestions for localizing.

We believe the Internet offers to local reporters many of the key resources tapped routinely by foreign correspondents, including foreign government and corporation handouts and foreign newspapers, if they are in a language the reporter commands.

We came up with these ideas for using the Internet:

  • Develop a list of useful Web sites. In general official government sites can be quoted with attribution. Many are good for factual background. For example, the U.S. Commerce Department has lists of export licenses by region. Corporate sites both at home and abroad also are useful.
  • We also strongly urge newspapers to train journalists on how to use the Internet. Several training resources are available in the United States.
There are many, many more ideas that will be presented in the handbook.

To conclude, let me say that we in ASNE believe international news-with its local meanings-is an opportunity for daily newspapers, and we have a responsibility to do more with it: To focus on international events and to explain to our readers in compelling ways how and why those events have an impact on their lives

© Copyright 2008 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122