Oct. 28, 2008 Webinar: Journalism, Audience and Advertising on the Web

Press freedom in China

Member alert: Free Speech Protection Act

Celebrate National Freedom of Speech Week, Oct. 20-26

· Diversity Mission   · Newsroom Employment Census
Page Location: Home » Diversity in Newspaper Newsrooms » National Time-Out for Diversity and Accuracy » Time-Out I in 1999
Year 2000

Published: May 17, 1999
Last Updated: December 06, 1999
Printer-friendly version

ASNE TIME-OUT APME

CONTENTS

Executive Summary

Survey Results
The Premise
Audits
Selecting Sources
Best Practices: Coverage (Ideas at a glance)
Best Practices: Internal
Changing Coverage
Changing Newsrooms
Pursuing Diversity and Accuracy
Voices in the Newsroom
Appendix A: A Letter to Editors
Time-Out 2000

About this report

Time-Out 2000

Dear Editor,

In May, more than 200 American newsrooms and an estimated 2000 journalists took part in the National Time-Out for Diversity and Accuracy. It was an encouraging beginning, but there's no question that we'll be judged by our follow-through.

The diversity committees of APME and ASNE invite you to participate in Time-Out Two in 2000 for Diversity and Accuracy. And this year we're working with educators to introduce the Time-Out's premise to journalism students.

We're again asking every American newroom and, this time, journalism schools to take time out during an assigned week -- April 17 to April 21 -- to discuss diversity in coverage as a core journalism issue based on the following premise (which has been recast in a more positive light):

We want to accurately reflect life in our communities. If our newspapers are to present a fundamentally accurate report, they must regularly portray the diversity of our communities. Failure to do so undermines our journalistic credibility.

We found in 1999 that using the language of the newsroom -- taking a content-focused approach to this diversity conversation -- created consensus in most newsrooms because every journalist shares the basic value of accuracy. We found that reframing the issue can provide motivation for significant change.

While America's editors say they value diversity in their newsrooms and in their coverage, change has been incremental. It's not our intention to undercut the business case for covering a diverse community, nor to diminish a principled commitment to recruiting and retention. Moreover, we're aware that we're not the first to think about diversity as a journalism issue. In fact, without decades of hard work by many to make our newsrooms more inclusive, we wouldn't be at the point where we can even have this conversation.

What do we hope to achieve in Time-Out Two?

The discussion would focus on three areas:

1. Consider the disturbing reality that we are being told -- and many of us acknowledge -- that our daily reports are inaccurate. We want to raise consciousness by reframing the conversation.

2. Celebrate the successes that have made our newspapers more reflective of our communities and codify those best practices for others.

3. If your newsroom participated in May's Time-Out, honestly assess the results. What did you promise? What did you deliver? What remains to be done? If it's the first time your newsroom is participating, it's a chance to talk about your best practices and commit to improving on this crucial score. We want to encourage tangible results.

We're again asking that you sponsor staff meetings, brown bags, pizza parties, whatever works for you. The purpose is to debate the premise we've presented and to see what changes -- if any -- you might want to make to achieve a higher degree of accuracy and authenticity in your daily report.

The diversity committees of APME and ASNE, working with the Maynard Institute and the Freedom Forum, will furnish you the following:
* A set of discussion guidelines, including suggestions for change that have worked at some newspapers.
* Three audit forms, enabling your newspaper to dive deeply into empirical data --or to just skim the surface.

The audit tools and guidelines are yours to use, to ignore or to modify. If you'd rather define reflecting a diverse community as thoroughness or fairness, rather than accuracy, that's fine with us. The key is to view diversity through a journalism lens. And we're defining diversity broadly, encompassing ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, age, socio-economic class, physical ability, religious and political affiliation.

We're asking that you send us a brief follow-up report by May 5. We'll publish preliminary findings at ASNE's conference in Washington in early April and the full report at APME in October, as we did this year.

If you're interested in participating or want to discuss the premise or the process, please contact one of the people listed below by March 1. The deadline for signing up for the Time-Out is March 1, 2000. Fifty-three papers enlisted at APME in Memphis in October.

If you intend to participate, please contact:
* Suki Dardarian, APME diversity committee vice-chair (after Jan. 2) at the Seattle Times.
* David Yarnold, San Jose Mercury News and APME diversity chair at (408) 920-5254 or dyarnold@sjmercury.com

Thanks for your consideration. Please let us know by December 15.

David Yarnold
APME Diversity Chair

Wanda S. Lloyd
ASNE Diversity Chair

Go back to top


PREVIOUS PAGE | NEXT PAGE


© Copyright 2008 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122