Shield law update: Senate vote may be imminent

Shield law update: 41 attorneys general sign letter to be sent July 8

Follow-up to “Shield law help needed”

Shield Law help needed

· A list of all reports   · ASNE Convention material
· Codes of Ethics   · Fundamental Documents
· News releases   · The American Editor
Page Location: Home » Archives » The American Editor » 2000 » September
Good writing - Take Mr. Potato Head along for better stories

Author: Kevin McGrath
Published: September 01, 1990
Last Updated: December 29, 2000
Printer-friendly version

Good writing

Take Mr. Potato Head along for better stories

By Kevin McGrath

One of the best tips I’ve seen for working revealing details into a story came from a reporter who takes a moment while reporting every story, writes the word “texture” at the top of a notebook page and starts writing down what his senses are telling him.

Not all the details make every story. But his reporting allows him to build every story from a richer trove of raw material: details that build pictures in the readers’ minds.

Here’s another tip that can help you remember to report for revealing detail: Try building Mr. Potato Head.

It sounds a bit silly, but it works if you look at it this way: Each of the Spudster’s parts can stand for one of your senses or some aspect of reporting on the scene. If you can assemble all the parts, you fill your notebook with the level of detail that can make a story jump off the page.

The idea first occurred when I was planning a critique of a deadline storytelling package on a fatal steel plant explosion in northwest Indiana.

The writers, editors and I sat down and tried to build the Spudster with clues gathered from the published stories.

As good as their work was — it was essentially a collection of scenes — they were surprised at the details they’d missed or the sensory clues they hadn’t provided readers. It helped them recognize how they could do better next time. Here are the parts and what they can mean:

The feet: For getting to the scene. If you report the bulk of your stories by phone, go ahead and turn to another page. This isn’t for you. You can’t report for revealing detail if you’re not willing to go to the scene, no matter how humble the story.

The eyes: Visual clues. Think of the old admonition “Show, don’t tell.” This can be a quick snapshot provided on deadline, or a rich tapestry of images woven into a feature story.

For example here’s a snippet from a fire at a historic church covered by The Wichita Eagle:

As (the pastor) spoke, grayish-brown smoke billowed overhead, and mist from the firefighters’ hoses sprayed the back of his neck. Dozens of firefighters, paramedics, police and reporters scurried around the building. Amid the chaos, Chittum greeted and embraced his parishioners.

The nose: Smells. This is something you’ll seldom find in newspaper stories, even descriptive pieces. But it can be a powerful scene-building tool. It’s a natural for fires, which have distinctive odors. Here’s how Jenny Upchurch of The Eagle used it in a story about a house explosion:

Sedgwick County Fire Marshal Gary Thompson said Sunday that the explosion’s cause has not been determined but a propane leak is the most likely possibility. The Sattlers first noticed the smell after work late Friday. It was like someone had dumped rotten broccoli down the kitchen sink disposal.

The ears: Sound clues. Another example from the church fire story:

As firefighters fought the blaze, water cascaded down the tile roof like a waterfall. Clumps of the red clay shingles clacked together as they dropped.

The hands: Tactile clues. What things feel like to the touch, or underfoot. This can be a tough one — it’s a visual clue and then some — and it’s seldom used, but it’s well worth reporting. Here’s how Roy Wenzl of The Eagle employed it in a story that took readers along the path of destruction left by a tornado:

Hundreds of yards from the nearest house, we find a Bible. It lies in a field of wet grass on the northwest corner of 55th and South Seneca. The field is full of toys, clothes, aluminum, an upside-down pickup with a crushed cab that must have flown many hundreds of yards.

The Bible is big, 3 inches thick, 9 inches long, and brick-heavy with rainwater. Some pages are torn. Whole chapters of Deuteronomy and Ezekiel are glued forever together. New and Old Testaments are filled with blades of God’s green grass.

The mouth: Quotes. Not just any old lip-flapping, but quotes that illumine and move the story. Dialogue is best. Even in short form. Another church fire example:

Several parishioners cheered when a worker carried out a blackened public address system console, set it on the church steps and announced that it apparently had survived the blaze.

“Speakers?” Chittum asked.

“No,” the worker said as he turned and went back inside. He returned a few minutes later with a charred piece of wood and metal that once had been a speaker.

As you can see, this sort of revealing detail can be easily gathered with a little thought. For some writers, it’ll take some practice before the thinking becomes a natural part of reporting at the scene. Others already use detail deftly but sometimes pass up a chance to add a bit more choices to the palate.

So it if it helps you remember, take Mr. Potato Head along in your mind the next time you’re out. You won’t have to tell anybody you play with a doll. And he just might help you become a more thorough reporter and a more descriptive writer.

McGrath is communities team leader and writing coach at The Wichita (Kan.) Eagle. He can be reached at kmcgrath@wichitaeagle.com


Home Page | This issue's table of contents | American Editor | Kiosk


Contact Craig Branson to comment on this site.


Copyright © 2000, American Society of Newspaper Editors
Last updated on October 18th at 11:45 AM.

© Copyright 2008 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122