Last Updated: October 10, 2001
Printer-friendly version
Changing ASNE
A new day requires a new structure
Opening membership and electing presidents to longer terms
will give the organization the strength to battle those who would raise profits
at the expense of standards
By Roy Peter Clark
The proudest moment of my professional life was the day I was elected a distinguished
service member of ASNE, which I consider the world’s most important lobby for
journalism values. Its leaders, starting with Gene Patterson in 1977, have been
my mentors, confidantes and friends. It’s because I love ASNE that I’m calling
for its reform.
Why change now?
Because ASNE is losing its influence.
Because many loyal journalists need a stronger beacon than the one ASNE has
the power to provide.
Because the lobby for profit is consolidating, while the lobby for journalism
excellence is ineffectively scattered.
Because the good work already done by the society is hiding under a bushel
when it should be the light of the democratic world.
Consider the attendance list for the 2001 ASNE convention, published on 3/28/01.
It shows the effects of an economic downturn: One working editor from each of
the following states: Delaware, Kentucky, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma,
Rhode Island, and West Virginia. Zero from Colorado. Only three newspapers represented
from the state of New Jersey. Some chains not sending anyone. Fewer than 300
working editors in all. With travel, training, and news budgets cut, with staff
cuts in the wings, with buy-outs and sell-outs, many top editors chose not to
send themselves for a week of surf ‘n’ turf with the hoity-toities.
Beyond the effects of the economy, it was hard not to see ASNE as a shrinking
institution: shrinking in size, in confidence, in relevance, in influence. In
the 1970s and 80s, with a generation of news titans at the helm, ASNE was afraid
of its own power. It shied away from flexing its collective muscles, preferring
a loose confederation exercising occasional moral suasion.
The 2001 ASNE convention revealed that the old ways need changing. It took
Jay Harris to fall on his sword for the ASNE membership to show a little life.
Gone are the days when top editors could call the shots within their companies.
Power has shifted way over to the corporate side, and nothing that Harris did
is likely to change anything. Most ASNE editors have too much at stake personally
to take a stand, and who needs a battlefield full of dead editors, anyway.
A solution, I suggest immodestly, is the re-invention of ASNE. Here’s how
it could work:
ASNE would greatly expand its membership to include younger editors, as young
as the department head level. As a first step, ASNE and APME must overcome petty
territorial differences and merge.
ASNE would create a distinguished service auxiliary — senior writers, first
amendment advocates, educators, new technologists, folks who can expand ASNE’s
thinking and help it fulfill its public service mission.
With its new membership, ASNE would work to expand its power and influence,
revisiting its mission, purpose and strategic position. It would lower the costs
of entry, and seek strong alliances with all institutions that share its mission,
and forge new relationships with the citizens who need journalists to do their
best work.
To make this happen, ASNE would need a new leadership structure. Now obsolete
is a president with a one-year term (and a day-job running a newspaper). Imagine
an ASNE president with rich editorial experience (a Sandra Rowe, perhaps) who
leaves her newspaper job and assumes a three-year term (renewable for another
three) as head of the world’s most powerful lobby for excellence in journalism.
Like many journalists and educators raised in the 1960s, I’m suspicious of
the exercise of power for its own sake. But some countervailing force to the
influence of Wall Street must be created to balance profit interest and public
service. The alternative is the creation of secret societies of journalistic
goo-goos, wringing their hands, but powerless in the face of an insatiable economic
force.
In the important new book The Elements of Journalism, Bill Kovach and Tom
Rosenstiel tell a story about a group of editors gathered around a campfire
in the Rocky Mountains in 1922. As owners of news organizations began proclaiming
the value of editorial independence, these editors seized on the opportunity
to create the first organization to promote the values of a responsible press.
The result was the founding of ASNE. With many of its values now at risk, it’s
time for ASNE to return to the campfire, feel its warmth, and begin again.
Clark is senior scholar at The Poynter Institute, where he teaches writing
and editing.