Shield law update: 41 attorneys general sign letter to be sent July 8

Follow-up to “Shield law help needed”

Shield Law help needed

An opportunity to help Iowa colleagues

· A list of all reports   · ASNE Convention material
· Codes of Ethics   · Fundamental Documents
· News releases   · The American Editor
Page Location: Home » Archives » The American Editor » 1997 » June
State of our business: Someone else wants it - Publishers’ message: Change or be changed

Author: Pam Johnson
Published: June 01, 1997
Last Updated: May 26, 1999
Printer-friendly version

State of our business: Someone else wants it

Publishers’ message: Change or be changed

In this competitive media marketplace, editors who take the lead in tackling their newspapers’ problems will be better off than if they let the advertising department do it

By Pam Johnson

Editors must assume leadership in marketing their newspapers, two publishers who built their careers in newsrooms told ASNE members in the session, "The State of our Business: Someone Else Wants It."

Jay Harris, chairman and publisher of the San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, and John Oppedahl, publisher, CEO and president of The Arizona Republic, Phoenix, said editors should want to heavily influence their company’s strategic decisions on new products and targeted audiences. Otherwise, they will be following someone else’s lead.

The publishers made their comments after portraits were drawn of today’s competitive marketplace by Clark Hoyt, vice president/news for Knight-Ridder Inc., and Jeffrey Rayport, assistant professor at the Harvard Business School who tracks news industry developments.

Hoyt issued the challenge that a newspaper can only be secure and fulfill its obligations — including being its community’s watchdog — if editors, as well as publishers, and advertising, marketing and circulation departments, work together to craft an enterprise that works for all its customers.

But it was Rayport’s numbers on newspapers and their competitors that underscored the theme of the panel: Our competitors are snaring more audience and growing at a quicker pace than our newspapers are mustering.

He emphasized the urgency that exists for newspapers to hone their competitiveness, citing the continued growth of direct mail and the projections of growing online use. The successes in both these arenas are at the expense of newspapers.

He urged newspapers to act now, pointing to industry numbers over the past 25 years that show readers and advertisers choosing alternatives to newspapers.

He said the newsroom can be a strong, competitive force because it knows content, a key component that technology companies have yet to figure out.

That point by Rayport underscored Harris’ view that the newsroom is critical to newspapers meeting their competition.

"It seems to me that on the circulation decline, a part of that is lifestyles, a part is questions about delivery service, but, ultimately, it boils down to a matter of whether or not we put out papers that people want to read and subscribe to," Harris said.

"That is fundamentally a job for editors in the newsroom," he said. "It is about being in touch with your community, about its needs and interests, and putting out a newspaper that addresses that on a consistent basis."

Oppedahl challenged editors to take ownership of readership retention and to be at the table or even lead the newspaper’s efforts to retain and attract customers.

"If editors cede that definition of the market to advertising departments or publishers, I think you’re making a big mistake," Oppedahl said, warning that advertising "will be in the lead unless you impose yourself or are involved in that conversation from the beginning."

Both publishers cited ways their newsrooms became involved in competitive, market-driven education and action.

The Mercury News added staff to cover the key area of technology, expanded its foreign coverage to the Pacific Rim and Asia, introduced a Spanish-language publication, and added a reader-oriented feature celebrating the community. Harris said the importance of these steps was that the newsroom led the efforts, showing that it could embrace change.

Oppedahl cited an educational effort he undertook as the Republic’s executive editor in which the news staff was required to attend presentations on reader and market information. Several good signs emerged. For example, he heard from some staff members that they never knew how valuable readers considered zoned news sections. It gave them new respect for those important coverage and marketing tools, and it led to staff commitment to improve the sections.

Asked if journalism values would collide with marketing values, Oppedahl said, "I don’t think you have to abrogate any of the journalism values that we all share by considering that you want a larger audience. ... You’ve got to approach it head-on, make sure the discussion is not dominated by one side or the other."

Harris said his company is focused on growth, not cost-cutting, and that journalism can only benefit from growth — as well as contribute to it through good journalism.

"Everybody who wants to continue to talk only about this conflict, as the business continues to erode, as the newshole gets smaller, and as the news staff gets smaller," Harris said, "please go off to the side of the room so the rest of us can start rebuilding."

Johnson is executive editor of The Arizona Republic in Phoenix.


Home Page | This issue's table of contents | American Editor | Kiosk


Contact Craig Branson to comment on this site.


Copyright © 1997, American Society of Newspaper Editors
Last updated on December 10th at 4:00 PM.
>

© Copyright 2008 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122