Oct. 28, 2008 Webinar: Journalism, Audience and Advertising on the Web

Press freedom in China

Member alert: Free Speech Protection Act

Celebrate National Freedom of Speech Week, Oct. 20-26

· A list of all reports   · ASNE Convention material
· Codes of Ethics   · Fundamental Documents
· News releases   · The American Editor
Page Location: Home » Archives » The American Editor » 1998 » July-August
Editorials with fangs

Author: Richard Aregood
Published: August 19, 1998
Last Updated: May 20, 1999
Printer-friendly version

Nearly everybody carries editorials. Even those newspapers that truly believe in current fads that assemble a group of self-interested citizens to write self-serving screeds to reflect the community’s voice.

Stop and think, though, about any editorials you remember. They are generally not an even-handed examination of the problems of solid waste.

Nor are they the ones that fully delineate both sides of some meaningless controversy.

The ones you remember are like Howell Raines' defenestration of former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara or Maura Casey's Javert-like pursuit of the high-ranking Homer Simpsons of the Connecticut nuclear industry. It is a Wall Street Journal editorial by Dan Henninger, ablaze either with the fervor of the right or the Passion of Martin Luther King. Or it’s Morris Thompson and the Philadelphia Daily News saying perceptive things about complicated subjects with the basic attitude of a street punk who’s figured everybody’s angle.

The common denominator here is small-p passion. Every one of these editorials was written by somebody who cares deeply. And every reader picks up on that.

We delude ourselves into thinking that we compete with television by becoming ever more superficial and focus group-driven. We delude ourselves because television’s singular appeal has very little to do with how superficial it is.

Television is a great conveyor of emotion, real or feigned. It has its brutally honest aspects. For instance, Richard Nixon could fool an ASNE lunch crowd into thinking he was a statesman. On TV, he was an oleaginous crook.

People identify with television. They feel that the local haircuts who read them a hysterical version of the news are their families. The haircuts are personalities.

We can make our newspapers into personalities in a classic newspaper way. We can write our opinions as if we care about them, as if they matter. All that requires is doing the editorials that make emotional sense instead of the ones that seem to be necessary.

These four writers all do that. Please enjoy them. And at the same time, consider as you react how nice it would be if people cared about newspapers.

The following are the writers’ thoughts on editorials followed by one of their favorites.

Aregood is editorial page editor of The Star-Ledger, Newark, N.J.

© Copyright 2008 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122