ASNE endorses Fallen Hero Commemoration Act

John Bodette and Charles Pittman 2008 McGruder award recipients

Shield law alert: Senate update

Legal services in Beijing for journalists covering the Olympics

· A list of all reports   · ASNE Convention material
· Codes of Ethics   · Fundamental Documents
· News releases   · The American Editor
Page Location: Home » Archives » The American Editor » 1998 » May
Some light on ASNE’s revised diversity goal

Author: Edward L. Seaton
Published: May 27, 1998
Last Updated: May 20, 1999
Printer-friendly version

A note from the president

Most editors concluded long ago that racial diversity in our newsrooms is essential both for good journalism and good business. Our credibility requires an inclusiveness that readers of all colors will trust. We know part of the answer to lagging circulations lies in attracting new readers from the fastest growing segment of our population, the non-white. Reflecting the diversity of our markets is a core survival issue.

That’s why the ASNE board is attempting to re-energize editors and establish a new goal beyond 2000. It believes a new goal, if the ASNE membership and the industry are to "buy in," requires wide discussion and intelligent deliberation. At the April convention, the board drafted a proposal (see page 21), which got a lot of national media attention, and now we seek thoughtful response.

We’ve worked at diversifying newsrooms for 20 years and made progress. In fact, at 11.5 percent journalists of color this year, the industry is approaching our 1978 aspiration of 15 percent by 2000. Still, these results are appalling when measured against our stated goal of parity with the minority population of the country, now at 26 percent. They also are embarrassing when radio and television are at 20 percent minority employment, nearly twice our level. In fact, despite prodigious efforts by ASNE and others, minority employment in the nation’s newsrooms has gone up a total of only 1.21 percentage points in the last five years while minority population is growing .5 percentage points a year.

So why the failure? Why are we not coming close to our Year 2000 Goal?

One reason for failure, some of us believe, is that the current goal is asking both too much or too little. In Manhattan, Kan., my town, our minority population is just over 10 percent. To achieve parity with the 26 percent national level seems unrealistic. Attracting and retaining minority recruits, who mostly come from urban centers, to central Kansas — even to a university city like ours — is challenging. Meanwhile, if major newspapers in urban centers set the 26 percent national average as their goal, that’s only half or less of the minority population in their communities.

Forty-two percent of U.S. dailies, mostly smaller papers, have not a single minority employee in their newsroom. This is important because first jobs in our business traditionally have come on small dailies, and their failure to hire minorities shuts many minority prospects out of the process.

In the context of these facts, the board concluded ASNE’s position should be to encourage and assist all newspapers, even the smallest, to employ minority journalists. It also proposed calling on all papers to achieve parity with their local communities as soon as possible. Several of the officers, including me, believe local parity is the real key. We do not think there are communities today without minorities, and we believe if all the newspapers of America match their local communities, we will be home free.

The board also determined that, as with the Year 2000 Goal, a numerical date-certain target should be included, and that it should be ambitious but credible given the history of the past 20 years. An unrealistic goal would be a disincentive. The board proposed, as a benchmark on the way to national parity, 20 percent minorities nationwide by 2010. Given last year’s gain of only a tenth of one percent, this target raises our sights considerably in the commitment to diversity.

While the board broadened our statement to oppose discrimination of all kinds — gender, sexual orientation, physical disability or other defining characteristics — ASNE’s annual census of newsrooms would continue to measure only minority employment.

With a view to getting wide feedback on the policy statement, the board now asks for comments from both inside and outside ASNE. We hope to adopt a final version at our October meeting. Once a decision is made, our Diversity Committee plans regional diversity dialogues to develop plans for reaching the new goal. Channeling new talent into newspapers and retention of minority journalists will likely be on the priority list.

Whatever the outcome of this goal-setting process, a renewed commitment and a great deal of work lie ahead. In particular, I see small newspapers like my own having a special obligation because we are the traditional point of entry to the profession. I also believe large urban papers may have to re-think their policies, as The Washington Post and other metros have recently, when they began to hire minority journalists for their first permanent jobs.

Let us hear from you. ASNE’s diversity director, Veronica Jennings, is our point person. Her e-mail at ASNE is vjenn@asne.org, fax 703/453-1133.

Seaton, ASNE president, is editor-in-chief of The Manhattan (Kan.) Mercury.

© Copyright 2008 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122