Call for nominations: ASNE Award for Editorial Leadership

A message to members on proposed bylaws changes

ASNE proposes taking 'paper' out of name, other significant changes to bylaws

Jan. 13, 2009 Webinar: Unlocking the Mystery of Sports Credentials

· A list of all reports   · ASNE Convention material
· ASNE Webinars   · Codes of Ethics
· Fundamental Documents   · News releases
· The American Editor  
Page Location: Home » Archives » The American Editor » 1999 » August
Get past the obvious when covering race

Author: Robert Barnes
Published: August 30, 1999
Last Updated: September 23, 1999
Printer-friendly version

Diversity

I brought back two lessons from our weekend discussing how to cover race and diversity. One, get past the obvious. Two, don’t ignore the obvious.

See, no one said this was easy. In fact, as our discussions and our examination of the good work presented made clear, this is extremely hard. We all, of course, are experts on the subject of race, but the smartest among us also admitted to feeling slightly incompetent in tackling an issue of such emotion and complexity.

The work we examined touched on familiar issues — the reaction of a town where immigrants have become a visible and powerful presence; an interracial child and her parents; the number of incarcerated black men. All of those stories “got past the obvious” because of months of reporting, a dogged pursuit of answers to the tough questions and editors’ commitment both to the projects and to the idea that “good” stories could be great. Here’s one smart thing I remember hearing: that readers know more about these subjects than we give them credit for, and we need to take our reporting to a higher level.

At the same time, we were fascinated by two television pieces, one on “black hair” and the other on African-American women’s — and black men’s — views of the female form. Someone referred to this as sharing racial secrets, an expression I loved. What else do we not know about each other? How can we “see” these topics as stories, and present them in compelling ways?

Here’s something else I brought back: Talk, talk, talk. It was only after we got over our fears — of being labeled hypersensitive if one is a minority, of being labeled racist if white — that our discussions and debate became deep and provocative. It is impossible for us all to see things the same way, our experiences and backgrounds and stations in life are too different. The same, of course, is true of our readers. So we have to talk about it. Not only in a conference room at Columbia, but in our newsrooms.

Barnes is metropolitan editor of The Washington Post.
 

© Copyright 2009 ASNE
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122