Member alert: SGI transition recommendations

Dec. 9, 2008 Webinar: Passion Sites -- Niche Web sites that focus on a narrow but passionate subject area

Ken Paulson and Susan Goldberg elected to ASNE leadership ladder

ASNE Job Fair schedule

· A list of all reports   · ASNE Convention material
· ASNE Webinars   · Codes of Ethics
· Fundamental Documents   · News releases
· The American Editor  
Page Location: Home » Archives » The American Editor » 1999 » August
The appendices

Published: September 01, 1999
Last Updated: September 23, 1999
Printer-friendly version

Book review

A third of “Warp Speed” is given to 10 appendices, which provide findings of studies designed or conducted by the Committee of Concerned Journalists (http://www.journalism.org/concern.htm) in 1998.

Appendix 1 tells us that a great deal of reporting in the first six days of the Clinton-Lewinsky story was not attributed to any source. About 40 percent of the reportage was “analysis, opinion, speculation or judgment.” The common judgment (to which the public objected as too hasty) was that the president was in deep trouble. The study concludes that there was much more news dissemination going on than news gathering. Bar charts show the sourcing breakdown for newspapers, newsweeklies, TV news and TV commentary shows.

Appendix 2 reports the findings of a study of four days’ worth of stories that ran in January and March in print or on TV, the focus again being on sources, especially how those sources were described or identified. Almost 60 percent of anonymous sources were described as essentially no more than “sources,” with no attempt to characterize the expertise, reliability or biases of the source. In some cases such stories held up very well. Bureau chiefs from three dailies described decisions not to publish when they were not entirely confident of their sources.

Seven of the appendices track major threads of the Clinton-Lewinsky story, such as “The Blue Dress Story” and “The Cigar Story.” Each ends with a reference to The Starr Report, either quoting pertinent paragraphs or stating that the report makes no reference to the allegations.

The perspective provided encapsulates the frantic swirl of rumors that no doubt we all remember. What we may forget in time is that these rumors were propelled by The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times, as well as by various TV and Internet sources. Only reference to the dress’s DNA evidence and the cigar innuendo originated on Matt Drudge’s Web site, according to the chronologies.

© Copyright 2008 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122