Shield law update: 41 attorneys general sign letter to be sent July 8

Follow-up to “Shield law help needed”

Shield Law help needed

An opportunity to help Iowa colleagues

· A list of all reports   · ASNE Convention material
· Codes of Ethics   · Fundamental Documents
· News releases   · The American Editor
Page Location: Home » Archives » The American Editor » 1999 » January
Getting what you need from your publisher

Author: Beverly Kees and some of ASNE’s member publishers
Published: February 08, 1999
Last Updated: March 02, 1999
Printer-friendly version

Getting what you want and need

Advice to editors: If at first you don’t succeed, try reading your strategic goals statement.

Publishers were asked how editors can get what they want and need from their bosses. Reid Ashe, publisher of The Tampa Tribune, summarized the key point: “In simplest terms: Agree on strategic goals, and show how your request relates to them.

“It also helps if you can show you’re eliminating activities that don’t relate to those goals,” he said.

Mike Maidenberg, publisher of the Grand Forks (N.D.) Herald agreed: “What works best for me is a well-reasoned argument, but this presupposes that the editor is in alignment with the strategic goals of the newspaper. A well-reasoned argument for putting a reporter in Washington or London would not go very far here; but if it were assigning resources to coverage in northwest Minnesota, which is seeing population growth, that would be a different matter.

“ ‘Well-reasoned’ means clearly describing the request, showing the benefits, and answering the obvious questions,” he said.

Much has been written in recent years about the growing gap between news and business viewpoints. Bridging that gap, Maidenberg said, is not “a question of technique. If an editor does not keenly understand or is fundamentally at odds with the strategy, his or her requests will run aground.”

“There must be a law of perversity at work in the newspaper business,” said Heath Meriwether, publisher of the Detroit Free Press. “As an editor-turned-publisher, I’m most impressed when the editor makes the business case for the editorial improvements, suggesting how the improvements will help advance our business as well as editorial purposes. Conversely, or perversely, as someone who has worked as an editor with publishers who came from the business side, I often found it effective to appeal to the editorial virtues of those publishers, to suggest to them they were helping make an important contribution to journalism. In either case, it’s important to see that the editor has done her or his homework.”

Ah, yes, homework — a point emphasized by other publishers, who want details along with the big picture. Go in prepared to answer specific questions on costs and effects.

Arnold H. Garson, president and publisher of the Argus Leader in Sioux Falls, S.D., offers a list of dos and don’ts:

  • DO give me the market, readership and even anecdotal information that supports the case you’re trying to make.
  • DO give me a reasonable and efficient plan to achieve the goal. Don’t pad it or underestimate what it will take.
  • DO give me choices: Plan A, Plan B, maybe even Plan C. We may not be able to do everything at once. Doing things in small steps can work.
  • DO reach beyond the news department to address the business implications of your plan. Make sure that you’ve included the folks in advertising, marketing, circulation and production. Often, these and other departments will be able to make a relevant contribution to the planning. At the very least, their interests need to be considered.
  • DO consider timing. If we’ve just completed the budget process, and the editor decides that she/he would like to propose additional news hole or staffing for a specific purpose in the coming year, there had better be a damn good reason why it didn’t come up during budgeting.
  • DON’T be afraid to dream or think big. A big idea that will strengthen our franchise or make an impact in the community is something to be cherished.
  • DON’T fail to keep your publisher informed. Even during the embryonic stages, your publisher will want to know what you are working on. Your publisher may even enjoy a chance to participate in the planning, discussion and brainstorming that shapes the idea.
  • DON’T dawdle. Be prepared, if your plan is approved, to deliver the results on schedule, maybe even ahead of schedule. Nothing is more irritating than deadlines not met. Editors understand this when it comes to producing the daily newspaper. They need to take the same approach in dealing with product enhancements.
Smart editors create allies in other departments before laying out the plan to the publisher.

Catherine Shen, vice president/strategic development, for Horvitz Newspapers, said: “For me, what makes an editor’s pitch convincing (and I’ve been in that editor’s place many times) is evidence that the editor understands the total picture of what the newspaper is for a reader and what impact any plans might have on all the other departments of the paper.

“For example, let’s say an editor has an idea for a new weekly section called ‘Now!’ In that editor’s presentation, besides what the content would be and where that content would come from and how much that content would cost in resources, I also want to know what readers in particular are being targeted and why, how it would fit into our production cycle, how much news hole and how many pages the editor has in mind, ideas for marketing it, and reasons advertisers would support it.”

That “presupposes that the editor talks to the other departments and is aware of their issues, and is willing to listen to naysayers (after all, the circulation department is often more on top of what’s literally happening with readers than the news department.). It’s pretty hard for a publisher to resist a project that has the support of most of the departments. There’s also no substitute for real passion and a willingness to stick out one’s neck.

“I guess it boils down to the fact that an editor has to approach the role with a ‘whole-newspaper’ mentality,” Shen said. “A newspaper is more than news content to its audience; it’s also where they find advertising, entertainment and a sense of community. In fact, editors at small newspapers probably don’t have much patience with these discussions, because they do most everything.”

Even smarter editors create allies before they need support on a project.

Dorothy Bland, publisher of the Fort Collins Coloradoan, offered suggestions to editors on how they can improve relations with other departments:

  • Encourage others to submit story ideas and make use of them.
  • Ask your market department for market research results and find ways to incorporate results into new coverage
  • Invite circulation staff to attend news meetings and post sales results daily.
  • Make sure your newsroom understands how they fit into the company’s mission/vision.
  • Encourage news staffers to work alongside others in community-building projects to help with team bonding.
If you are unable to take the advice outlined here at your paper, take heart; change is hard. It will take time.

As Niccolò Machiavelli wrote in “The Prince”: “There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.”

Kees is editor and program director of The Freedom Forum Pacific Coast Center, San Francisco.

© Copyright 2008 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122