Oct. 28, 2008 Webinar: Journalism, Audience and Advertising on the Web

Press freedom in China

Member alert: Free Speech Protection Act

Celebrate National Freedom of Speech Week, Oct. 20-26

· A list of all reports   · ASNE Convention material
· Codes of Ethics   · Fundamental Documents
· News releases   · The American Editor
Page Location: Home » Archives » The American Editor » 1999 » March-April
How one couple overcame a strict nepotism policy: living together

Published: March 29, 1999
Last Updated: May 20, 1999
Printer-friendly version

Newsroom love

Susan Denley and Bill Nottingham lived together for several years before they got married in 1982, not because they were averse to marriage but because their employer, the St. Petersburg (Fla.) Times, had a strict nepotism policy that would have required one of them to leave.

“I considered it more of a nuisance than a tragic circumstance,” said Denley, who now is director of editorial hiring and staff development at the Los Angeles Times.

When the couple left St. Petersburg in the mid-1980s for California, it was because they wanted to try something new, not because they were angry about the forced delay of their nuptials. Denley and Nottingham met while working at the St. Petersburg Times in 1973. They were just starting their careers when their romance began. But the Times’ policy forbade the hiring of relatives or the retention of both spouses if employees married.

“In the early ’70s there was sort of an expectation that women would quit their jobs,” Denley said. “It was during the height of the women’s movement. I wasn’t about to quit my job, and the St. Pete Times was the best place to work in the area.”

They weren’t the only newsroom couple. Some hid their relationships, but Nottingham and Denley’s supervisors were aware that they were involved.

The nepotism policy “seemed sort of silly. In fact, we were together,” Denley said. “We certainly wouldn’t have waited that long to get married without the policy.”

They were able to marry while still working at the paper after management changed the policy to allow people already working at the paper to marry and remain employees.

“Over time, it became clear we had to change to be competitive (in hiring),” said Senior Editor Tom Rawlins. “It’s still very clear that nobody can work for a spouse or relative.”

Rawlins said the policy was changed because times had changed and exceptions started being made, which diluted the policy. “Staffers were living together and a lot wanted to get married and didn’t because they’d have to leave,” he said. “It was pointed out that the problems were there whether they were married or not.”

Denley said she and Nottingham were careful to avoid any potential problems of one reporting to the other, although while she was night city editor, she “once or twice by accident had to edit something he did.”

She said it’s not surprising she and Nottingham, now senior editor for regionals at the Los Angeles Times, wound up together. “From the time I set foot in the newsroom, I just wasn’t interested in men who weren’t journalists.”

— M.E.S.

© Copyright 2008 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122