Last Updated: May 20, 1999
Printer-friendly version
Using narrative
style
Bite-sized storytelling increases reader interest,
allows the telling of complex stories and increases morale in the newsroom
as management shows attention to craft
If this were a narrative — a story form in which the action unfolds
chronologically — I would hold up the nut paragraph and make you read until
the very end.
But I’m not going to do that, although I am a new convert to the raw
power and influence of this newspaper writing form. So, I’ll get to the
point quickly: Editors should care — need to care — about this form of
storytelling. At a time when newspapers are faced with more competition
from print and electronic media, when readers say they have no time to
read, editors and publishers can derive benefits from adopting narrative
storytelling as a major writing form. Here’s why:
-
Narratives create reader interest — and can sell newspapers.
-
Narratives help tell complicated stories and allow readers to make sense
of their lives.
-
Narratives have a profound, positive effect on morale in the newsroom.
In the last several months, there has been a marked increase in interest
in narrative storytelling. Late in 1998, the American Press Institute and
the Poynter Institute for Media Studies each held conferences for writers
and editors on this story form. In October, the University of Missouri’s
journalism school conducted a forum, “Can Good Storytelling Save Newspapers?”
Newspapers from coast to coast, large and small, have experimented with
extended narrative techniques. Most have been successful. All created new
reader interest and excitement in the newsroom.
“Readers ate it up,” said Thomas Oliver, special projects editor of
The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Constitution. The newspaper’s six-part
“Nine Minutes, 20 Seconds” was told largely in narrative form. The series,
written in November by Gary Pomerantz, recreated the drama of a 1995 plane
crash in which a number of people on board survived and told their stories.
“We had over 400 e-mails and letters,” Oliver said. “A recurring statement
(from readers) was one I have been waiting for all my career: ‘I couldn’t
wait to get the next day’s newspaper!’ ”
Tom French, a reporter for the St. Petersburg (Fla.) Times, has been
writing extended narratives for 12 years. His personal efforts have been
an inspiration to many. French’s 1997 project, “Angels and Demons,” won
last year’s Pulitzer Prize for feature reporting. The 10-part series chronicled
the tragic deaths of three Florida tourists and the efforts to find the
killer.
“Narratives are a really good tool for bringing people into the paper,”
French told an API seminar in Pomona, Calif., in December. “When a narrative
really works, we find that new readers find their way into the newspaper.”
Jan Winburn, an assistant managing editor at The Sun in Baltimore who
also spoke at the seminar, has overseen a number of narrative projects,
and has quantified the power of the form. She said that the Sun’s 16-day
narrative “God’s Other Plan” — about a woman’s fight against cancer — was
a circulation success. The Sun heavily promoted the series, and on the
Sunday in January 1997 that the story started, single-copy sales jumped
9,500. On the final day sales were up 7,000. In all, circulation spiked
3 percent during the series.
“People were waiting anxiously to see what would happen next,” Winburn
said. “We got everyone in town talking about the same thing. A reader remarked
that hasn’t happened in Baltimore since the Colts left town.”
Winburn said that in a day when people get headlines and other information
from electronic sources, narrative storytelling is something that is best
done by newspapers: “The storytelling magazines — the Saturday Evening
Post, Collier’s — are all gone. The field is left open to us.”
Reporter Ken Fuson, Winburn’s colleague at the Sun, is also a strong
proponent. “(Storytelling) is a tool, but will it save newspapers?” he
asked at the Missouri workshop. “I doubt it — but I’d like to try it. I’m
not saying get rid of the objective, inverted pyramid stuff. Let’s add
some of this to it, because readers show us they like it.”
Curt Hazlett, managing editor of the Portland (Maine) Press Herald,
found that while many readers appreciated the form, “perhaps many more
hated it” when his newspaper published “A Stolen Soul,” in mid-1998. The
series by Pulitzer winner Barbara Walsh, was about the murder of a man
from a interracial marriage and his mother’s fight for justice. It ran
in 28 parts, with each installment on the front page. Some readers said
they tired of the length and its Page 1 play.
“There is no model for this,” Hazlett said. “Many in the newsroom felt
it went on too long.” Readers said the same thing. We should have taken
into account the restlessness of readers, he said. “But there was a certain
addictive quality to it all.”
Hazlett, who noted that the newspaper received more than 400 e-mails
and calls on the series, said the staff learned from the experience. “We
need to consider doing more but doing them differently.”
Unlike Hazlett, writing coach Susan White found a more receptive audience
when The San Diego Union-Tribune published “The Toy Maker,” a 15-part series,
in late 1997. The series traced the odyssey of a San Diego businessman
and the toy he set out to create and market.
The series prompted 650 calls to a special line set up in the newsroom.
About 285 left lengthy messages, mostly positive.
“The story was special. It was a gift to the reader,” White said. “It
was also a special kick-up for the newsroom. It raises the bar. It gives
attention to the reporter. It shines a new light on them.”
And it’s infectious.
Bob Baker, assistant city editor and writing coach of the Los Angeles
Times, said that narrative projects at his newspaper “empower other people
to try new things. It gets people to think more about what they do.”
White said that using narrative technique in the San Diego newsroom
has resulted in better communication. “Editors are forced out of a routine.
We learn that every reporter has a different style, so our editing is better.
We talk more,” she said.
“With reporters, you’re teaching a new tool. It’s like breaking a horse.
But it’s the ultimate mental pickup.”
White said the learning process can be arduous but the payoff substantial.
“It takes a stretch to do it right. It’s a marathon that depends not on
your muscles, but on your heart,” she said.
But it all comes back to the reader. All agree the effort is worth it.
Oliver in Atlanta found that people have plenty of time to read. “They
will make the time to read a newspaper if we give them something to sink
their teeth into.” A special connection with readers is the special heart
of narrative storytelling — and potentially the biggest payoff.
Winburn was more philosophical. “It’s the way life itself unfolds. We
don’t know what will happen next until we plod on. The newspaper can use
narratives to connect with the reader in a way other stories don’t,” Winburn
said.
Added Oliver, “Narratives are inbred into our consciousness. Relatives
of passengers wrote to say they finally under-stood what their loved ones
had been through.”
Watson is an associate director at the American Press Institute in
Reston, Va.