Shield law update: 41 attorneys general sign letter to be sent July 8

Follow-up to “Shield law help needed”

Shield Law help needed

An opportunity to help Iowa colleagues

 
Page Location: Home » 1999 » Examining Our Credibility: Perspectives of the Public and the Press
Austin (Texas) American Statesman: Bias

Published: August 04, 1999
Last Updated: August 10, 1999
Printer-friendly version

Austin (Texas) American Statesman: Bias

Major initiative

With a substantial percentage of its population that can be classified as belonging to some ethnic or politically active community, Austin, Texas, is a market that appears to present a wealth of raw material for the JCP’s investigation of bias. The Austin American-Statesman will begin its project with a series of "audit panels" in which members of these communities (focused on race/ethnicity as well as social class) will be invited to discuss/comment on bias that they perceive within the paper.

The major project, however, will be the selection of at least 16 specific stories (twice a week for two months), which the staff will take out the next day (to breakfast spots, other community venues) to solicit opinion and commentary from readers.

These interviews will be scripted as far as possible (e.g., do they think the paper did a good job on this story? Is there anything missing, anyone else that should have been contacted for comment? Do they think the story was fair, complete, balanced, etc.?).

This will ensure that JCP topics are addressed, and a package of reader comments and photos will be published "the day after" adjacent to a précis of the original story for context.

Different than "man on the street" quotes or letters to the editor, this "Day After" review will be published in whatever news sections the story originally appeared, to make it as integral a part of the story’s coverage as possible. In addition, the plan is to include in the 16 stories tested a wide range of stories (e.g., metro, national, sports, features) as well as photographs, headlines and presentation (placement/play).

Import to the JCP

Because the "Day After" project employs real stories as stimuli for discussion of bias, it provides clearer insights into craft specifics than generalized survey responses could generate. Further, the commitment to actually publishing the package of reader reactions to a specific story should stimulate conversation in the market, and perhaps encourage a wider variety of readers to contact the paper to express their opinions and points of view.

JCP test method

Besides the potential for in-depth analysis of the kinds of bias and coverage deficiencies readers notice in the 16 "Day After" packages, after completion of the series a telephone survey will be conducted in Austin to measure readers’ awareness of the initiative and their reactions to it — specifically, whether they believe this approach helps to limit any bias they find in the paper. A survey within the newsroom is also planned, codifying "what was learned" from the project.

Supporting initiatives

In addition to the major initiatives described above, the paper plans to:

  • Take editorial board meetings out to branch libraries.
  • Hold a series of community forums to teach non-profits and service organizations how to get information into the paper, and therefore increase the number of "small" events in the paper’s listings, church coverage, Celebrations page, etc.
  • Use all of these points of interaction to enrich the paper’s source list with more than "the usual suspects."
For more information, contact Kathy L. Warbelow, managing editor, at 512/445-3683; e-mail: kwarbelow@statesman.com

© Copyright 2008 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122