| Table 40
Published: August 03, 1999
Last Updated: January 03, 2000
Printer-friendly version
|
| Table 40 |
| NEWS JUDGMENT |
| |
| "Let's say that
in an election year, several news organizations learn that a candidate
has had an extra-marital affair 10 years earlier. These news organizations
did not publish this information because it had nothing to do with the
candidate's qualifications or current behavior. Do you think they made
the right decision, or do you think they should have made this information
available to the public?" |
| |
Total
Public |
| Right decision not to publish |
68%
|
| Should have published it |
24
|
| It depends/don't know/not sure |
8
|
| |
| "In the course of
covering a gubernatorial election, you find out that one of the candidates
had an extra-marital affair 10 years earlier. If he or she was a front-runner
with a very good chance of winning, do you pursue and publish the story?" |
| |
Total Newsroom
|
| Definitely |
11%
|
| Probably |
26
|
| Probably not |
41
|
| Definitely not |
7
|
| Not sure |
15
|
| |
| "If the candidate
was not a front-runner -- but so far back in the pack that he or she had
no realistic chance of winning -- do you pursue and publish the story?" |
| |
Total Newsroom
|
| Definitely |
6%
|
| Probably |
19
|
| Probably not |
47
|
| Definitely not |
18
|
| Not sure |
10
|
|
|